Hi Rob,
On 18-08-2025 5:51 p.m., Rob Herring wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 05:37:54PM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
Add the compatible for an 64Kb EEPROM from Belling.
It is generally not required to add a compatible here assuming
"atmel,24c64" is enough to identify the specific device (i.e. read the
device's ID registers). If it is not sufficient, then some details here
about why would be useful.
I thought DT was meant to describe the hardware, and this specific
EEPROM on the device is a Belling BL24S64, and it's software-compatible
to this generic atmel compatible.
That's why we have compatible = "belling,bl24s64", "atmel,24c64";
Am I missing something, or misunderstanding how DT is meant to be written?
Regards
Luca
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml
index
0ac68646c077790c67c424d0f9157d6ec9b9e331..1e88861674ac8525335edec1b214675c8efa3ffe
100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml
@@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ properties:
- const: atmel,24c32
- items:
- enum:
+ - belling,bl24s64
- onnn,n24s64b
- puya,p24c64f
- const: atmel,24c64
--
2.50.1