On 2025-12-20 23:00, Chunyu Hu wrote:
The test supports arm64 as well so the comment is incorrect. And there's
a check for arm64 in va_high_addr_switch.c.

CC: Luiz Capitulino <[email protected]>
Fixes: 983e760bcdb6 ("selftest/mm: va_high_addr_switch: add ppc64 support 
check")
Fixes: f556acc2facd ("selftests/mm: skip test for non-LPA2 and non-LVA systems")
Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Luiz Capitulino <[email protected]>

---
  tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh 
b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh
index a0c93d348b11..9492c2d72634 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/va_high_addr_switch.sh
@@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ check_supported_ppc64()
check_test_requirements()
  {
-       # The test supports x86_64 and powerpc64. We currently have no useful
-       # eligibility check for powerpc64, and the test itself will reject other
-       # architectures.
+       # The test supports x86_64, powerpc64 and arm64. There's check for arm64
+       # in va_high_addr_switch.c. The test itself will reject other 
architectures.
+
        case `uname -m` in
                "x86_64")
                        check_supported_x86_64


Reply via email to