On 1/8/26 08:42, Sasha Levin wrote: > I suppose that we can restate the same here, but whats the purpose? > to put it in front of whatever media outlets might be looking? Yeah, that's my only objection to adding the new hunk that James and Lorenzo were suggesting. It's arguably covered earlier in _this_ document:
> +Guidelines > +========== .... > +tool-generated contributions. Ensure that you understand your entire > +submission and are prepared to respond to review comments. But, if folks feel it's that important a point, I guess mentioning it twice-ish is OK.
