On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 15:55:01 +0000 Lorenzo Stoakes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sure to the above, but it seems (...?) you are ok with my addition to the > document which hopefully is tempered enough to provide the emphasis I'm > looking for (note I say - all tools - even if LLMs are the most obvious > exmaple) - without being so strident as to seem out of scope? Yes I liked the last example. As I stated, this discussion helped me understand the issues I had with what you wanted to add. I wanted this document to be just as applicable to checkpatch and sed scripts as it is to LLMs. My fear was it was becoming too focused on AI where those that are submitting checkpatch and coccinelle scripts will think this doesn't apply to them. -- Steve
