On 1/9/26 07:48, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote: >>>>> +If tools permit you to generate series automatically, expect >>>>> +additional scrutiny in proportion to how much of it was generated. >>>>> + >>>>> +As with the output of any tooling, the result maybe incorrect or >>>>> +inappropriate, so you are expected to understand and to be able to defend >>>>> +everything you submit. If you are unable to do so, then don't submit the >>>>> +resulting changes. >>>>> + >>>>> +If you do so anyway, maintainers are entitled to reject your series >>>>> without >>>>> +detailed review. >> I like it. > Hmm, you like my version but then below argue against every point I make in > favour of it? I'm confused? > > Did you mean to say you liked a suggested other revision or... really this > one? 🙂 > > If so and Dave likes it too then LGTM, pending any Linus/other veto.
Look good to me too! I'll try to get a v5 out with this later toady.
