On Mon, Jan 12, 2026, Jim Mattson wrote:
> KVM doesn't implement a separate G_PAT register to hold the guest's
> PAT in guest mode with nested NPT enabled. Consequently, L1's IA32_PAT
> MSR must be restored on emulated #VMEXIT from L2 to L1.
> 
> Note: if L2 uses shadow paging, L1 and L2 share the same IA32_PAT MSR.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> index c751be470364..9aec836ac04c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
> @@ -1292,6 +1292,16 @@ int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
>       kvm_rsp_write(vcpu, vmcb01->save.rsp);
>       kvm_rip_write(vcpu, vmcb01->save.rip);
>  
> +     /*
> +      * KVM doesn't implement a separate guest PAT
> +      * register. Instead, the guest PAT lives in vcpu->arch.pat
> +      * while in guest mode with nested NPT enabled. Hence, the
> +      * IA32_PAT MSR has to be restored from the vmcb01 g_pat at
> +      * #VMEXIT.

Wrap closer to 80 chars.

> +      */
> +     if (nested_npt_enabled(svm))
> +             vcpu->arch.pat = vmcb01->save.g_pat;
> +
>       svm->vcpu.arch.dr7 = DR7_FIXED_1;
>       kvm_update_dr7(&svm->vcpu);
>  
> -- 
> 2.52.0.457.g6b5491de43-goog
> 

Reply via email to