On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 02:51 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Look: I can't fix *everyone's* stuff. This was a consequence of ongoing > > > unbounded churn in the x86 tree. If we can find a way of preventing those > > > guys (and everyone else) from trashing everyone else's stuff then we'd > > > have > > > much smoother sailing. > > > > Understood. That is where I jump in and regenerate my patches on the > > latest available level. That the patches did hold up for some months in > > -mm now without really breaking anything is an indication that we can > > push them upstream now, isn't ? That would make the patch problem go > > away and I could queue my s390 specific page table rework. Our KVM > > people keep asking about it. > > yes, against 2.6.24-mm1 would be good, thanks. I really don't know what > went wrong in i386 but I ended up getting all grumpy at the macro mess > we've made in all the pagetable handling. Please do take a look at > improving that.
I'm trying to replace the __pte_free_tlb macros my patch touches for the different architectures. Not much luck yet, there is a reason why __pte_free_tlb is a macro in the first place: welcome to #include hell. I'm starting to get grumpy as well.. Just an example for x86-64: * asm-x86/tlb.h includes asm-generic/tlb.h * asm-generic/tlb.h includes asm-x86/pgalloc.h * asm-x86/pgalloc.h includes asm-x86/pgalloc_64.h * asm-x86/pgalloc_64.h includes asm-x86/tlb.h * since asm-x86/tlb.h started this #include chain it expands to nothing * asm-x86/pgalloc_64.h calls tlb_remove_page which is defined in asm-x86/tlb.h but the compiler hasn't seen the definition yet * you loose.. I got x86-64 compiled by removing the #include <asm/pgalloc.h> from asm-generic/tlb.h. But who knows what will break if the include is missing .. I'll cross compile some of the other architectures next. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/