On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 10:06:18 +0100 Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 10:46 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > I got x86-64 compiled by removing the #include <asm/pgalloc.h> from > > > asm-generic/tlb.h. But who knows what will break if the include is > > > missing .. I'll cross compile some of the other architectures next. > > > > > > > urgh, well, thanks for trying. If there's significant risk factor (or > > hassle) in fixing the macros then I'd suggest we not do it for now - it's a > > separate project. > > I'm still at it. I does make sense to convert the damn macros to inline > functions. The question now is the order of things, the macro cleanup > first or the sub-page page tables first? I would prefer the sub-page > page tables first since that code has been hanging around in -mm for a > while and could go upstream after I regenerated the patch and test > compiled it again. We do need it for KVM and we want to push our KVM > patches for s390 soon. I'd suggest do the macro ceanup later. That's the sort of thing which we can/should trickle through arch maintainers. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/