Hi Nathan, On 22/01/2026 05:55, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 10:55:53AM +0100, Guillaume Tucker wrote: >> Feel free to make these tweaks now, or we might wait a bit to see if >> others have more feedback with further changes and I can send a v4. > > How about this? Send a v4 with: > > 1. An initial MAINTAINERS entry addition in patch 1 for > scripts/container like I suggested earlier and scripts/container > explicitly added to the KERNEL BUILD section so that Nicolas and I > are included for handling patches. > > 2. Add the Documentation to the aforementioned MAINTAINERS entry as part > of patch 2. > > 3. Either encorporate my suggested change for preferring podman over > docker with the appropriate changes elsewhere inte the patch set like > you mentioned or explore checking for the docker alias explicitly. > Entirely up to you timewise, as long as it results in Nicolas's > environment working, since I don't think that will be too uncommon. > > 4. Encorporate any other feedback that you feel is appropriate at this > stage (if there is any low hanging fruit).
Sounds great, I just sent a v4 as described above. I've kept any extra features out for now to avoid introducing new issues and added a workaround for out-of-tree builds in the docs. Hopefully this will solve Nicolas' use cases and work for others too. > Then we can apply it so that folks can start using it in -next for > testing and validation. After that, you can start thinking of things you > would want to work on for future merge windows from the list you already > started, as I know how that goes when working on a new tool :) Thanks again for all the reviews, it'll be good to see what people make of it! Meanwhile I'll keep working on further improvements, starting with the limitations mentioned in the docs. Cheers, Guillaume
