On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:11:06PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > The problem is that any reasonably recent PC can generate enough
> > forged SYN packets to overwhelm reasonable SYN queues on a much more
> > powerful server.
>
> Have you actually seen this with a recent kernel in the wild or are
> you just talking theoretically?
>
> Linux uses some heuristics to manage the syn queue that should
> still ensure reasonable service even without cookies under attack.
> Also SYN-RECV sockets are stored in a special data structure optimized
> to use minimal resources.
>
> It is far from the classical head drop method that was so vunerable
> to syn flooding.
I work at a hosting company and we see these kinds of issues in the
real world fairly frequently. I would guess maybe a monthly basis.
The servers where we have seen this are typically running RHEL 4 or 5
kernels, so I can't really speak to how recent the kernel is in this
specific term.
If I can find a box that we could temporary get a kernel.org kernel
on, I'll see if I can get a real comparison together. We have
collected a few of the more effective attack tools that have been left
on compromised systems, so it wouldn't be too difficult to get some
numbers.
--
Ross Vandegrift
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The good Christian should beware of mathematicians, and all those who
make empty prophecies. The danger already exists that the mathematicians
have made a covenant with the devil to darken the spirit and to confine
man in the bonds of Hell."
--St. Augustine, De Genesi ad Litteram, Book II, xviii, 37
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
