On 3/5/26 5:52 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Hi! > > On 3/5/26 19:06, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> On 3/5/26 12:06 AM, Rosen Penev wrote: >>> Allows simplifying allocation to a single kzalloc call. >>> >>> Also allows using __counted_by for extra runtime analysis. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <[email protected]> >>> --- >> >> I don't see how this is an improvement - __counted_by() is useful for >> cases where we don't know how many entries there are, but in this >> case it's fully deterministic (as priv->num_clks is a compile-time >> constant) > > Will this always be the case in the future (entries being a compile-time > constant)?
While I'm not high up enough to make those decisions, and if I were, I would very much not be allowed to disclose them, my personal prediction is that we are probably not going to make many more 28nm chips, if any (see filename) Konrad
