On 11/3/26 04:10, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote: > On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 at 07:45, Leon Hwang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 8/3/26 21:46, Chengkaitao wrote: >>> From: Kaitao Cheng <[email protected]> >>> >>> Replace per-kfunc btf_id chains in list/rbtree/res_lock and graph node >>> checks with btf_id_in_kfunc_table() and static kfunc tables for easier >>> maintenance. >>> >> >> Such refactoring should be the first patch? Less churn. Then, update the >> list only. >> >> However, is_bpf_rbtree_api_kfunc(), is_bpf_res_spin_lock_kfunc(), and >> BPF_RB_NODE should be excluded, because you didn't touch them in this >> series. > > I think moving clean up earlier makes some sense, but why exclude > rbtree and res spin lock? > Looks better to me to do them all. >
Okay. Acceptable for me to keep them. Thanks, Leon
