On Mon, 9 Mar 2026 at 07:45, Leon Hwang <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/3/26 21:46, Chengkaitao wrote: > > From: Kaitao Cheng <[email protected]> > > > > Replace per-kfunc btf_id chains in list/rbtree/res_lock and graph node > > checks with btf_id_in_kfunc_table() and static kfunc tables for easier > > maintenance. > > > > Such refactoring should be the first patch? Less churn. Then, update the > list only. > > However, is_bpf_rbtree_api_kfunc(), is_bpf_res_spin_lock_kfunc(), and > BPF_RB_NODE should be excluded, because you didn't touch them in this > series.
I think moving clean up earlier makes some sense, but why exclude rbtree and res spin lock? Looks better to me to do them all. > > Thanks, > Leon > > [...]
