On Wed, 11 Mar 2026 20:26:39 +0100 Andrew Lunn wrote: > > For that we have what we need with phy_link_topology, as each PHY has > > its index, we should be good to go in that regard hopefully :) > > So depth would be local to a component? We could have two PHY > components, each with a different index, and depth = 0? > > I _think_ Jakub's depth was more at a global level? But then it would > need to be passed down as we do the enumeration.
Oh, sorry, I responded without reading the whole discussion :) No, I imagined the depth would be within a single component, so under control of a single driver (instance). The ordering between components should be defined by PHY topology etc so it's outside of the loopback config.
