This is the first mail without annoying and pointless full quotes, so chiming in here. Sorry if I missed something important in all the noise.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 03:19:36PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 at 21:44, Joanne Koong <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Overall, my intention with bringing this up is just to make sure we're > > at least aware of this alternative before anything is merged and > > permanent. If Miklos and you think we should land this series, then > > I'm on board with that. > > TBH, I'd prefer not to add the famfs specific mapping interface if not > absolutely necessary. Yes, fuse needing support for a specific file systems sounds like a design mistake. >This was the main sticking point originally, > but there seemed to be no better alternative. > > However with the bpf approach this would be gone, which is great. So what is this bpf magic actually trying to solve?
