On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > If this logic was to be placed in fs/iomap/ as Christoph suggested, > I think the rest of the UAPI issues could be sorted out.
For that you don't need it in iomap, it could stay in fuse an be a generic striping API. Although IMHO doing it in iomap would be a lot cleaner and more efficient as well. > In any case, considering the sheer amount of discussion on this thread > I have scheduled a cross-track FS+MM+IO for Famfs and DAX iomap. > > I wasn't going to include Storage people at first, but since Christoph > mentioned that stride/offset iomap could be useful for block iomap, > I included them as well. There is no overlap with storage. Any use of this would have to be file system level striping, not stackable block driver level striping. And keeping the rooms smaller is a win on it's own - anyone interested can join anyway.
