On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 3:33 PM Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2026 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > If this logic was to be placed in fs/iomap/ as Christoph suggested, > > I think the rest of the UAPI issues could be sorted out. > > For that you don't need it in iomap, it could stay in fuse an be a > generic striping API. Although IMHO doing it in iomap would be a > lot cleaner and more efficient as well. > > > In any case, considering the sheer amount of discussion on this thread > > I have scheduled a cross-track FS+MM+IO for Famfs and DAX iomap. > > > > I wasn't going to include Storage people at first, but since Christoph > > mentioned that stride/offset iomap could be useful for block iomap, > > I included them as well. > > There is no overlap with storage. Any use of this would have to be > file system level striping, not stackable block driver level striping. > And keeping the rooms smaller is a win on it's own - anyone interested > can join anyway. >
OK. Changed to FS+MM. Thanks, Amir.
