Two bugs exist in virtio_transport_recv_listen():

1. On the transport assignment error path, sk_acceptq_added() is called
   but sk_acceptq_removed() is never called when vsock_assign_transport()
   fails or assigns a different transport than expected. This causes the
   parent listener's accept backlog counter to be permanently inflated,
   eventually causing sk_acceptq_is_full() to reject legitimate incoming
   connections.

2. There is a race between __vsock_release() and vsock_enqueue_accept().
   __vsock_release() sets sk->sk_shutdown to SHUTDOWN_MASK and flushes
   the accept queue under the parent socket lock. However,
   virtio_transport_recv_listen() checks sk_shutdown and subsequently
   calls vsock_enqueue_accept() without holding the parent socket lock.
   This means a child socket can be enqueued after __vsock_release() has
   already flushed the queue, causing the child socket and its associated
   resources to leak
   permanently. The existing comment in the code hints at this race but
   the fix was never implemented.

Fix both issues: add sk_acceptq_removed() on the transport error path,
and re-check sk->sk_shutdown under the parent socket lock before calling
vsock_enqueue_accept() to close the race window. The child socket lock
is released before acquiring the parent socket lock to maintain correct
lock ordering (parent before child).

Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1b2c9c4a0f8708082678
Tested-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Deepanshu Kartikey <[email protected]>
---
 net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c 
b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 416d533f493d..fad5fa4a4296 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -1578,6 +1578,7 @@ virtio_transport_recv_listen(struct sock *sk, struct 
sk_buff *skb,
         */
        if (ret || vchild->transport != &t->transport) {
                release_sock(child);
+               sk_acceptq_removed(sk);
                virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb, sock_net(sk));
                sock_put(child);
                return ret;
@@ -1588,11 +1589,19 @@ virtio_transport_recv_listen(struct sock *sk, struct 
sk_buff *skb,
                child->sk_write_space(child);
 
        vsock_insert_connected(vchild);
+       release_sock(child);
+       lock_sock(sk);
+       if (sk->sk_shutdown == SHUTDOWN_MASK) {
+               release_sock(sk);
+               sk_acceptq_removed(sk);
+               virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(t, skb, sock_net(sk));
+               sock_put(child);
+               return -ESHUTDOWN;
+       }
        vsock_enqueue_accept(sk, child);
+       release_sock(sk);
        virtio_transport_send_response(vchild, skb);
 
-       release_sock(child);
-
        sk->sk_data_ready(sk);
        return 0;
 }
-- 
2.43.0


Reply via email to