On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:24:24 -0700 SeongJae Park <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Andrew, > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:48:37 -0700 Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:49 -0700 SeongJae Park <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > TL; DR: Let users set different DAMOS quota charge ratios for DAMOS > > > action failed regions, for deterministic and consistent DAMOS action > > > progress. > > > > Add, thanks. > > > > As mentioned provately, Sashiko claims to have found things which it > > didn't see in the RFC. > > > > https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected] > > TL; DR: I find no blocker for this patch series from the Sashiko reviews. > > Now sashiko replies its reviews for DAMON patches to authors and > [email protected]. So I replied [1,2,3] my review of the reviews to those > on [email protected] mailing list. As I mentioned on the TL;DR, I find no > blocker for this series. > > And I think you didn't see those because those are sent to only authors and > [email protected]. > > I nowadays reply-all to original recipients only if Sashiko found a blocker. > I > will also add short notice for non-RFC patches if Sashiko found zero issue. ... Now I think the short notice is only redundant and silly, as the full review is available on damon@ list and the one who primarily interested in (Andrew) understands that. I feel like the short-notice reply-all only increase unnecessary traffic and my redundant typing. I will not do the short notice broadcasting, unless someone makes a diffeernt voice. Thanks, SJ [...]
