On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 6:22 AM Julian Anastasov <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] > Sorry that such change was delayed but there were > many changes in IPVS for the last month. The last that may > delay this patch is: > > v3 of "ipvs: avoid possible loop in ip_vs_dst_event on resizing" > https://lore.kernel.org/lvs-devel/[email protected]/T/#u > > May be we have to wait this change to reach net and > net-next. Also, we can reconsider which queue to use, these works > resize hash tables and call synchronize_rcu(), should we switch to > system_dfl_long_wq if such job is considered "long" ?
Hello Julian, Thanks for letting me know. Yes, if it is considered long we can switch to the long unbound version. I will prepare the v2 with this change. Thanks! -- Marco Crivellari SUSE Labs
