On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written: > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 08:00:39PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > > On the day of Friday 08 February 2008 Andi Kleen hast written: > > > > On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 06:39:17PM +0100, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Yes, confirmed. timer w/o the skipping stays XT-PIC on nforce2. > > > > > > > > Confirmed what? Did you test my patch on both machines? > > > > What was the result? > > > > > > I confirmed that it (nforce2) needed the acpi_skip_timer_override. If you > > > read my mail, you knew I didn't test your patch. > > > > Ok can you please do so then? Or stop your obstructism? > > Grr, I don't know why I am discussing with stubborn and/or arrogant devs like > you seem to be. But I actually did what you wanted and as *expected* - as I > said I understand that trivial piece of code you posted - your patch fails > here for my nforce2:
No worry, this patch wont go anywhere near mainline as long as it breaks stuff and obviously you are under no obligation to re-test patches that have not been changed just re-submitted. x86 changes, which are considered for mainline are staged in the mm branch of the x86 git tree: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=shortlog;h=mm Instructions for checking it out are here: http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README Please let us know, if there is anything which breaks your box(en). Thanks for your feedback and patience. tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
