On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 10:50:22 +0100 (CET) Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [2.6.25 candidate I believe] > > The specification of SS in the public manuals is a little unclear, > but I got confirmation from Intel that SS implies that there is no > cache flush needed on caching attribute changes. I'm hearing slightly different information, but am still chasing this one. It might be better to delay this one to .26 ;-( (I would very much like to avoid the cache flush but... it really HAS to be safe) -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use [EMAIL PROTECTED] For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
