On Feb 12, 2008 3:13 PM, Haavard Skinnemoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:43:30 -0600 > Olof Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > - depends on (PCI && X86) || ARCH_IOP32X || ARCH_IOP33X || ARCH_IOP13XX > > > + depends on (PCI && X86) || ARCH_IOP32X || ARCH_IOP33X || ARCH_IOP13XX > > > || AVR32 > > > > This is a slippery slope. Things should be the other way around instead, > > create a HAVE_DMA_DEVICE, select it in the relevant platform code and > > make DMADEVICES depend on that. > > Agree. I'll cook up a patch tomorrow to make it use the new HAVE_* > scheme. >
I suggested something similar here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=118670671806100&w=2 > > Or just let the subsystem always be available. > > It used to be always available, but then it was changed. Assuming there > was a reason for this change, I guess we don't want to change it back. > Adrian had concerns about users enabling NET_DMA when the hardware capability is relatively rare. So, +1 for HAVE_DMA_DEVICE > Haavard -- Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
