On 2026/8/17 15:24, Chen Pei wrote:
Signed loads from arena memory are currently rejected on riscv64, as
bpf_jit_supports_insn() refuses BPF_MEMSX loads when in_arena is set,
while x86 and arm64 gained support for them in v6.18. Compilers such
as GCC-14 are free to generate signed loads into arena memory, which
breaks loading of otherwise valid BPF programs on riscv64.

Implement BPF_PROBE_MEM32SX support in the RV64 JIT by reusing the
existing arena handling: the arena base (RV_REG_ARENA) is added to
the source register and the load is emitted with sign extension
(lb/lh/lw). Add BPF_PROBE_MEM32SX to the add_exception_handler()
mode gate so that faulting loads get an exception table entry which
clears the destination register and resumes execution.

Verified by running the arena LDSX selftests (arena_ldsx_disasm,
arena_ldsx_exception, arena_ldsx_s8/s16/s32) on riscv64 QEMU, all
passing.

Signed-off-by: Chen Pei <[email protected]>
---
  arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 15 +++++++++------
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index f9d5347ba966..5786f7dfc8a7 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -777,6 +777,7 @@ static int add_exception_handler(const struct bpf_insn 
*insn, int dst_reg,
        if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_PROBE_MEM &&
            BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_PROBE_MEMSX &&
            BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_PROBE_MEM32 &&
+           BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_PROBE_MEM32SX &&
            BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC)
                return 0;
@@ -1902,13 +1903,19 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx,
        case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_H:
        case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_W:
        case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32 | BPF_DW:
+       /* LDX | PROBE_MEM32SX: dst = *(signed size *)(src + RV_REG_ARENA + 
off) */
+       case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32SX | BPF_B:
+       case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32SX | BPF_H:
+       case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM32SX | BPF_W:
        {
                bool sign_ext;
sign_ext = BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_MEMSX ||
-                          BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEMSX;
+                          BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEMSX ||
+                          BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM32SX;
- if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM32) {
+               if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM32 ||
+                   BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM32SX) {
                        emit_add(RV_REG_T2, rs, RV_REG_ARENA, ctx);
                        rs = RV_REG_T2;
                }
@@ -2126,10 +2133,6 @@ bool bpf_jit_supports_insn(struct bpf_insn *insn, bool 
in_arena)
                        if (insn->imm == BPF_CMPXCHG)
                                return rv_ext_enabled(ZACAS);
                        break;
-               case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEMSX | BPF_B:
-               case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEMSX | BPF_H:
-               case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEMSX | BPF_W:
-                       return false;
                }
        }

Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <[email protected]>

Reply via email to