On Wed, Sep 02, 2026 at 04:10:01PM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 03:16:10PM -0700, Ziyang Men wrote:
Hi Reviewers,
Just want to follow-up on this patch series. Please let me know the possible
issues and I will fix them.
AI bots have raised real concerns. Please address those and then resubmit.
Hi Shakeel,
I have reviewed the AI bots suggestions, and it seems the main issue is to
decide whether we want some kfuncs to be NMI safe, e.g.,
- The `bpf_cgroup_base_stat()`, which calls the `cputime_adjust()` and
in turn
acquires `raw_spin_lock_irqsave()`.
- The `bpf_cgroup_css()` and `bpf_css_release()` to get/put the css.
The simply solution is to mark them SLEEPABLE.
Hi Eduard, what's your idea about this? Do we want to mark them SLEEPABLE or
there
are better ways stand in the mid?
Thanks,
Ziyang
