On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:29:00 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > patches to get CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL actually to work (it > > includes the Makefile patch proposed in this thread already). > > > > note that the fix to ACPI is an actual stack corruption bug (caught by > > ssp thanks to a lucky stack layout), due to the misuse of the pci > > accessor functions, probably a whole-tree audit is in order for > > similar bugs. > > > > note also that the vsyscall functions (more precisely, all the code > > that goes into .vsyscall* sections) had better be separated into their > > own .c files so that they can be compiled without -mcmodel=kernel and > > use %fs for getting the ssp cookie, if ssp is desired at all there). > > thanks, i've picked up your patch into x86.git#mm and also made > stackprotector-all default-enabled so that we get more test coverage of > this critical security feature. x86.git#mm can be picked up via: > > http://people.redhat.com/mingo/x86.git/README > > head of the tree: > > ----------------> > commit e1d96d3e489d02b12984fb3c755b0f9a9ae0fe5f > Author: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed Feb 13 16:15:34 2008 +0100 > > x86: enable stack-protector by default > > also enable the rodata and nx tests. > <---------------- > > your patch booted fine here with stackprotector-all enabled.
Is it signed-off-by: pageexec ? Couldn't that be a problem? --- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
