On Wed, Sep 23, 2026 at 01:42:29PM -0500, Shenwei Wang wrote: > From: Shenwei Wang <[email protected]> > > Remote processors may announce multiple GPIO controllers over an RPMSG > channel. These GPIO controllers may require corresponding device tree > nodes, especially when acting as providers, to supply phandles for their > consumers. > > Define an RPMSG node to work as a container for a group of RPMSG channels > under the imx_rproc node. Each subnode within "rpmsg" represents an > individual RPMSG channel. The name of each subnode corresponds to the > channel name as defined by the remote processor.
Sorry, but DT defines the names of nodes. If it's a gpio-controller, then 'gpio'. I still don't understand where the unit address gets defined. 0 and 1 look a bit made up. I'm sure you explained it before, but *this patch* needs to explain it. When you define a second protocol, the 0 and 1 addresses are taken already, so you can't have 'clock-controller@0' for example. Rob
