On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 01:59:33PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 02:31:32PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > > The tag's useful for push back on review, > > > > That's the point I raised during the maintainer summit. It's actually > > the *absence* of a tag that helps me push back on review. It allows me > > to ask submitters if they forgot to add the tag, and in many cases (so > > far) they simply don't reply. > > While the tag's useful for pushback, pushing back is the issue. > > The asymmetry between submitter volume/reviewer bandwidth is the MOST > CRITICAL issue we face. > > If reviewers are required to reply to all of these people, the project's > dead, AFAIC. > > Ignoring is the only workable long-term solution.
How do you decide which patches to ignore ? > The issue we had before was a lack of a CLEAR and LOUD 'yes ignore these > people' from Linus. > > We now have that :) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
