On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:22:19AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:41:44 +0100 Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> you may also want these:
> >> ---
> >> [bl]e_add_cpu conversion in return
>
> > upsets powerpc (at least):
> >
> > fs/ufs/swab.h: In function `fs64_add':
> > fs/ufs/swab.h:47: warning: passing arg 1 of `le64_add_cpu' from
> > incompatible pointer type
> > fs/ufs/swab.h:49: warning: passing arg 1 of `be64_add_cpu' from
> > incompatible pointer type
> > fs/ufs/swab.h: In function `fs64_sub':
> > fs/ufs/swab.h:58: warning: passing arg 1 of `le64_add_cpu' from
> > incompatible pointer type
> > fs/ufs/swab.h:60: warning: passing arg 1 of `be64_add_cpu' from
> > incompatible pointer type
>
> sorry for this. Is it correct to cast like the patch below does?
I don't think so. Their prototypes are wrong. We can:
a) remove fs64_add and fs64_sub as nobody use them
b) fix them - change second parameter do __fs64 (and convert to [bl]e64_add_cpu)
Evgeniy?
> If not (anyone) feel free to correct and send a patch yourself.
> The patch below was *not* tested
> ---
> [bl]e_add_cpu conversion in return (with cast)
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/ufs/swab.h b/fs/ufs/swab.h
> index 1683d2b..594d6e8 100644
> --- a/fs/ufs/swab.h
> +++ b/fs/ufs/swab.h
> @@ -44,18 +44,22 @@ static __inline u32
> fs64_add(struct super_block *sbp, u32 *n, int d)
> {
> if (UFS_SB(sbp)->s_bytesex == BYTESEX_LE)
> - return *n = cpu_to_le64(le64_to_cpu(*n)+d);
> + le64_add_cpu((__le64 *)n, d);
> else
> - return *n = cpu_to_be64(be64_to_cpu(*n)+d);
> + be64_add_cpu((__le64 *)n, d);
> +
> + return *n;
> }
>
> static __inline u32
> fs64_sub(struct super_block *sbp, u32 *n, int d)
> {
> if (UFS_SB(sbp)->s_bytesex == BYTESEX_LE)
> - return *n = cpu_to_le64(le64_to_cpu(*n)-d);
> + le64_add_cpu((__le64 *)n, -d);
> else
> - return *n = cpu_to_be64(be64_to_cpu(*n)-d);
> + be64_add_cpu((__le64 *)n, -d);
> +
> + return *n;
> }
>
> static __inline u32
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
