On Friday 22 February 2008 21:06:00 Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > > It is not my problem, if you refuse to use b43. > > You also still refuse to tell me details about your card and _what_ > > does not work. I do own lots of different card and they > > all work fine with b43. There's one exception, the 4311 rev 3 (or > > something, > > don't quite remember). But patches are available and will ship in 2.6.25. > > bcm43xx won't get removed until that shipped. > > Yes, it's a 4311 rev 01, but I'm probably was just too lame to upgrade the > firmware or something. :E > > I really don't get it, what is going on here? You state that the new b32 > driver > has problems on some hardware, where the old bcm43xx driver just works. > And at the same time, you are surprised that I "refuse" to use the b43 driver > and push patches for the bcm43xx driver you broke... Oh, really, why?!
So, please find someone who will sign-off your patch. I won't. What's so hard to understand about that? Do I _have_ to sign off all patches random people send to me? I do _not_ want to be made responsible for that patch by signing it off. It is as simple as that. And I officially do not care about bcm43xx since a year and a half anymore. So why should I ACK it or sign it off? -- Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
