* Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. Alexey, did you identify a specific git commit that caused the
> regression? Can we just revert that from 2.6.24? Michael, even if
> _you're_ planning to remove bcm43xx we must not let it regress until
> it's gone.
btw., if the best answer is: "do not enable b43 and bcm43xx at once in
the .config because we messed up the dependencies and fixing it in
2.6.24-stable is unfortunately too risky", then that's a perfectly fine
answer for -stable. Then the fix would be to exclude each other in the
Kconfig space (which is not risky). But just ignoring bugreports and
NAK-ing a fix is not a valid answer.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
