"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What happened with this being a management tool for shared memory > segments?! Unfortunately we lost this ability in the 2.4.0-test series. SYSV shm now works only on an internal mounted instance and does not link the directory entry to the deleted state of the segment. IMNSHO the new implementation is so much cleaner that it was worth it. Probably we should fix ipcrm to be more flexible. Greetings Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- swapfs for 2.4.1-pre J . A . Magallon
- [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 J . A . Magallon
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 J . A . Magallon
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM question (ramfs abuse) Christoph Rohland