"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Mmmmmm, does this mean that mounting /dev/shm is no more needed ?
> > One step more towards easy 2.2 <-> 2.4 switching...
Yes, it is no longer needed. You will need for POSIX shm, but there
are not a lot of program out there using it.
> In some ways it's kind of sad. I found the /dev/shm interface to be
> rather appealing :)
I totally agree :(
Christoph
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- swapfs for 2.4.1-pre J . A . Magallon
- [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 J . A . Magallon
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 J . A . Magallon
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.1 Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... J . A . Magallon
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... Christoph Rohland
- Re: [patch] tmpfs for 2.4.... Christoph Rohland
- Re: VM question (ramfs abuse) Christoph Rohland

