Hi, Tejun
Just nitpicks..
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:41:51 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Move worklist and all worker management fields from global_cwq into
> the new struct worker_pool. worker_pool points back to the containing
> gcwq. worker and cpu_workqueue_struct are updated to point to
> worker_pool instead of gcwq too.
>
> This change is mechanical and doesn't introduce any functional
> difference other than rearranging of fields and an added level of
> indirection in some places. This is to prepare for multiple pools per
> gcwq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/trace/events/workqueue.h | 2 +-
> kernel/workqueue.c | 216 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> index 4018f50..f28d1b6 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(workqueue_queue_work,
> __entry->function = work->func;
> __entry->workqueue = cwq->wq;
> __entry->req_cpu = req_cpu;
> - __entry->cpu = cwq->gcwq->cpu;
> + __entry->cpu = cwq->pool->gcwq->cpu;
> ),
>
> TP_printk("work struct=%p function=%pf workqueue=%p req_cpu=%u cpu=%u",
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 27637c2..bc43a0c 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ enum {
> */
>
> struct global_cwq;
> +struct worker_pool;
>
> /*
> * The poor guys doing the actual heavy lifting. All on-duty workers
> @@ -131,7 +132,7 @@ struct worker {
> struct cpu_workqueue_struct *current_cwq; /* L: current_work's cwq */
> struct list_head scheduled; /* L: scheduled works */
> struct task_struct *task; /* I: worker task */
> - struct global_cwq *gcwq; /* I: the associated gcwq */
> + struct worker_pool *pool; /* I: the associated pool */
> /* 64 bytes boundary on 64bit, 32 on 32bit */
> unsigned long last_active; /* L: last active timestamp */
> unsigned int flags; /* X: flags */
> @@ -139,6 +140,21 @@ struct worker {
> struct work_struct rebind_work; /* L: rebind worker to cpu */
> };
>
> +struct worker_pool {
> + struct global_cwq *gcwq; /* I: the owning gcwq */
> +
> + struct list_head worklist; /* L: list of pending works */
> + int nr_workers; /* L: total number of workers */
> + int nr_idle; /* L: currently idle ones */
> +
> + struct list_head idle_list; /* X: list of idle workers */
> + struct timer_list idle_timer; /* L: worker idle timeout */
> + struct timer_list mayday_timer; /* L: SOS timer for dworkers */
What is 'dworkers'?
> +
> + struct ida worker_ida; /* L: for worker IDs */
> + struct worker *first_idle; /* L: first idle worker */
> +};
> +
> /*
> * Global per-cpu workqueue. There's one and only one for each cpu
> * and all works are queued and processed here regardless of their
> @@ -146,27 +162,18 @@ struct worker {
> */
> struct global_cwq {
> spinlock_t lock; /* the gcwq lock */
> - struct list_head worklist; /* L: list of pending works */
> unsigned int cpu; /* I: the associated cpu */
> unsigned int flags; /* L: GCWQ_* flags */
>
> - int nr_workers; /* L: total number of workers */
> - int nr_idle; /* L: currently idle ones */
> -
> - /* workers are chained either in the idle_list or busy_hash */
> - struct list_head idle_list; /* X: list of idle workers */
> + /* workers are chained either in busy_head or pool idle_list */
s/busy_head/busy_hash/ ?
Thanks,
Namhyung
> struct hlist_head busy_hash[BUSY_WORKER_HASH_SIZE];
> /* L: hash of busy workers */
>
> - struct timer_list idle_timer; /* L: worker idle timeout */
> - struct timer_list mayday_timer; /* L: SOS timer for dworkers */
> -
> - struct ida worker_ida; /* L: for worker IDs */
> + struct worker_pool pool; /* the worker pools */
>
> struct task_struct *trustee; /* L: for gcwq shutdown */
> unsigned int trustee_state; /* L: trustee state */
> wait_queue_head_t trustee_wait; /* trustee wait */
> - struct worker *first_idle; /* L: first idle worker */
> } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
