On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 09:05:01 +0200 > Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz> wrote: > > > When we are back to the patch. Is it going into 3.5? I hope so and I > > think it is really worth stable as well. Andrew? > > What patch. "memcg: prevent OOM with too many dirty pages"?
Yes. > > I wasn't planning on 3.5, given the way it's been churning around. I don't know if you had been intending to send it in for 3.5 earlier; but I'm sorry if my late intervention on may_enter_fs has delayed it. > How > about we put it into 3.6 and tag it for a -stable backport, so it gets > a bit of a run in mainline before we inflict it upon -stable users? That sounds good enough to me, but does fall short of Michal's hope. Hugh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
