"Michael H. Warfield" wrote:
>
> > Please explain how there is any different between an CNAME or MX pointing
> > to an A record in a different SOA versus an MX pointing to a CNAME
> > pointing to an A record where at least one pair is local (same SOA).
>
> Ah! But now you are placing conditions on it (that at least one
> pair is local). That is the very fine distinction that makes up the
> "not quite" in the "almost" above and the difference between the "should
> not" vs the "must not" in the specifications. You basically can't qualify
> it by saying "you can do this, but only if one pair is in the same SOA".
>
No. My point is that potential for inefficiency is not a valid reason
for banning something outright. This should be an administrative
decision, nothing more.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
