On 07/03/2012 02:34 PM, Michael Wang wrote: > From: Michael Wang <wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > it's impossible to enter else branch if we have set skip_clock_update > in task_yield_fair(), as yield_to_task_fair() will directly return > true after invoke task_yield_fair().
Could I get some conclusion on this patch? Should we clean up that peace of code or leave it there? Regards, Michael Wang > > Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > kernel/sched/core.c | 7 ------- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > index 9bb7d28..77c14aa 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > @@ -4737,13 +4737,6 @@ again: > */ > if (preempt && rq != p_rq) > resched_task(p_rq->curr); > - } else { > - /* > - * We might have set it in task_yield_fair(), but are > - * not going to schedule(), so don't want to skip > - * the next update. > - */ > - rq->skip_clock_update = 0; > } > > out: > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/