On 08/10/2012 11:05 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
> On 07/03/2012 02:34 PM, Michael Wang wrote:
>> From: Michael Wang <wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> it's impossible to enter else branch if we have set skip_clock_update
>> in task_yield_fair(), as yield_to_task_fair() will directly return
>> true after invoke task_yield_fair().
>
> Could I get some conclusion on this patch? Should we clean up that peace
> of code or leave it there?
s /peace/piece and cc mike...
>
> Regards,
> Michael Wang
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wang...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/core.c | 7 -------
>> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> index 9bb7d28..77c14aa 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
>> @@ -4737,13 +4737,6 @@ again:
>> */
>> if (preempt && rq != p_rq)
>> resched_task(p_rq->curr);
>> - } else {
>> - /*
>> - * We might have set it in task_yield_fair(), but are
>> - * not going to schedule(), so don't want to skip
>> - * the next update.
>> - */
>> - rq->skip_clock_update = 0;
>> }
>>
>> out:
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
