On 08/11/2012 11:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might
be a better solution.
[PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that
are being mapped
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540
Actually, apply that series of 5 patches.
I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip.
However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying
the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that. On the other
hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway.
Ah, right... still waiting for a rev of the patch to address Yinghai's
legitimate request for minor code restructuring. Other than that, the
patchset is really The Right Thing.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
