On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 10:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > +void perf_trace_event_submit(void *raw_data, struct ftrace_event_call > > *event_call, > > + struct perf_trace_event *pe) > > +{ > > + struct hlist_head *head; > > + > > + head = this_cpu_ptr(event_call->perf_events); > > + perf_trace_buf_submit(raw_data, pe->entry_size, pe->rctx, pe->addr, > > + pe->count, &pe->regs, head); > > +} > > Can you make perf_trace_buf_submit() go away? Its reduced to a simple > fwd function and layering another wrapper on top seems like pushing it.
You mean just have perf_trace_event_submit() call perf_tp_event() directly? I have no problem with that. Although I may make that into a separate patch to keep this patch as a 'move' and the other patch as the change. Looking at the history of perf_trace_buf_submit(), it use to be more than one function call. But when you inlined perf_swevent_put_recursion_context(), it became just a one2one mapping. I'm assuming that we want to convert all calls to perf_trace_buf_submit()s into perf_tp_event()? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/