Hi Mel,

On 08/12/2012 02:22 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:


I went through the patch again but only found the following which is a
weak candidate. Still, can you retest with the following patch on top and
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING set please?


I've gotten in several hours of testing on this patch with
no issues at all, and no output from CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
(I'm assuming it would show up on a serial console).  So,
it seems to me this patch has done the trick.

CPU utilization is staying under control, and write-out rate
is good.

You can add my Tested-by: as you see fit.  If you work
up any refinements and would like me to test, please
let me know.

Thanks -- Jim

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to