On Aug 15, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:35:34PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> Do you consider allowing support for Windows as overengineering? >> >> I don't think there is a way to hook BSOD on Windows so attempting to >> engineer something that works with Windows seems odd, no? >> > Yan says in other email that is is possible to register a bugcheck callback. >
Here you go - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff553105(v=vs.85).aspx Already done in virtio-net for two reasons: 1. we could configure virtio-net to notify QEMU in a hacky way (write 1 to VIRTIO_PCI_ISR register) that there was a bugckeck .It was very useful debugging complex WHQL issues that involved host networking. 2. Store additional information (for example time stamps of last receive packet, last interrupt and etc) in crash dump. Yan. > -- > Gleb. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
