> This isn't necessary (nor desirable).  If the API here is that we get called 
> from process context for ->open and ->close(), just use the
> spin_lock_irq and spin_unlock_irq variants for these paths (avoiding the need 
> to remove the lock acquire in ->open and ->close.

OK. I will update my patch based on your comment above.
Thank you for your quick response.

Seiji

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to