On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 10:09 +0300, Shmulik Ladkani wrote: > On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 16:33:32 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedeki...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > We do not have that big user-base. No one uses 0 in the tree, most use > > the default. I never heard anyone using 0. I did not use it also. I > > think it is OK to have the lower range start from non-zero. But why it > > is 2 and not 1 - I am not sure :-) > > Artem, > > Note that originally range was 0..25 (percentage). > > It was changed to be 2..256 (per 1024) by 07ad322 in linux-ubi. > > Seems arbitrary change. > So if you'd like, we can fix to 1..256 (or 0..256) - as you prefer.
Yeah, I wanted to make it 1..256 but forgot, will do now. 0..256 would need some more work to avoid division by 0. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part