On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 08:55 +0200, Richard Genoud wrote: > Hi Artem, > 2012/8/19 Artem Bityutskiy <dedeki...@gmail.com>: > > Yeah, I wanted to make it 1..256 but forgot, will do now. 0..256 would > > need some more work to avoid division by 0. > Division by 0 is handled in the get_bad_peb_limit() function, I don't > see another dangerous place.
if (mult_frac(limit, 1024, max_beb_per1024) < device_pebs)
will divide by 0 if max_beb_per1024 is 0.
> (and if we want to be coherent with user-space, it should be 0..255,
> as the range is coded with an u8)
I think it should be uint16_t instead, because we are defining ABI here
and we should not assume no one will ever nee values higher than 255.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
