On Thursday 23 August 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> I see your point but alternate patch is pushing down the fix to the low
> level driver and that means you end up patching more drivers when they
> use COUPLE idle infrastructure. That was the only reason I was thinking
> of suppressing the error at the source.
>
> Since it is just for the random builds and actually doesn't impact the real
> functionality as such, I am fine with your proposed patch too.
Ok. It would be nice of course to test if this actually works on uniprocessor
configurations.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
