On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Philippe De Muyter <p...@macqel.be> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:21:23PM +0200, Stany MARCEL wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <ge...@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Stany MARCEL
>> > <stany.mar...@novasys-ingenierie.com> wrote:
>> >> Signed-off-by: Stany MARCEL <stany.mar...@novasys-ingenierie.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>
>> >> This driver is an adaption of the one given by freescale for kernel
>> >> 2.6.25.
>> >>
>> >> Tested with kernel 3.4.8 with arch/m68k backported from linux-m68k head
>> >> 2 FEC configured with shared phy
>> >>
>> >> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 7 +-
>> >> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>> >> drivers/net/phy/broadcom522x.c | 171
>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >
>> > This patch and "[PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver" need to go
>> > through the netdev tree, or collect acks there.
>> >
>> > Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>> >
>> > Geert
>> >
>>
>> Hello Geert,
>>
>> Please, what is the good process to follow as patch 3 depends on patch 1 ?
>
> Actually, IMHO patch 3 does not depend on patch 1, and I even think that
> patch 1 is not needed, except to get a message with "BCM5222" instead
> of "Generic PHY" in the kernel log.
>
> AFAIK the phy interface is standardized.
>
> Philippe
I meant patch 3 depends on patch 2 (multi channel dma api)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
