By the help of @idle_rebind.ref_done, the life time of idle_rebind
is expanded enough and it can include the whole reference-time
of @rebind_hold, so we can move @rebind_hold from gcwq to idle_rebind.

Also we change it to completion instead. we need to ease the pain of 
WORKER_REBIND.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   20 ++++++++------------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index d40e8d7..55864d1 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -185,8 +185,6 @@ struct global_cwq {
                                                /* L: hash of busy workers */
 
        struct worker_pool      pools[2];       /* normal and highpri pools */
-
-       wait_queue_head_t       rebind_hold;    /* rebind hold wait */
 } ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
 
 /*
@@ -1309,15 +1307,16 @@ struct idle_rebind {
        int               idle_cnt;     /* # idle workers to be rebound */
        struct completion idle_done;    /* all idle workers rebound */
 
+       /* idle workers wait all idles to be rebound */
+       struct completion rebind_hold;
+
        /*
         * notify the rebind_workers() that:
-        * 0. All worker leave rebind_hold:
         * 1. All idle workers are rebound.
         * 2. No idle worker has ref to this struct
         *
         * @ref_cnt: # idle workers which has ref to this struct
         * @ref_done: any idle workers has no ref to this struct,
-        *            nor rebind_hold.
         *            it also implies that all idle workers are rebound.
         */
        int               ref_cnt;
@@ -1331,8 +1330,6 @@ struct idle_rebind {
  */
 static void idle_worker_rebind(struct worker *worker)
 {
-       struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->pool->gcwq;
-
        /* CPU must be online at this point */
        WARN_ON(!worker_maybe_bind_and_lock(worker));
        ++worker->idle_rebind->ref_cnt;
@@ -1341,7 +1338,7 @@ static void idle_worker_rebind(struct worker *worker)
        spin_unlock_irq(&worker->pool->gcwq->lock);
 
        /* we did our part, wait for rebind_workers() to finish up */
-       wait_event(gcwq->rebind_hold, !(worker->flags & WORKER_REBIND));
+       wait_for_completion(&worker->idle_rebind->rebind_hold);
 
        /* noify if all idle worker are done(rebond & wait) */
        spin_lock_irq(&worker->pool->gcwq->lock);
@@ -1408,11 +1405,12 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct global_cwq *gcwq)
        /*
         * Rebind idle workers.  Interlocked both ways in triple waits.
         * We wait for workers to rebind via @idle_rebind.idle_done.
-        * Workers will wait for us to finish up by watching %WORKER_REBIND.
+        * Workers will wait for us via @idle_rebind.rebind_hold.
         * And them we wait for workers to leave rebind_hold
         * via @idle_rebind.ref_done.
         */
        init_completion(&idle_rebind.idle_done);
+       init_completion(&idle_rebind.rebind_hold);
        init_completion(&idle_rebind.ref_done);
        idle_rebind.ref_cnt = 1;
 retry:
@@ -1455,7 +1453,7 @@ retry:
                list_for_each_entry(worker, &pool->idle_list, entry)
                        worker->flags &= ~WORKER_REBIND;
 
-       wake_up_all(&gcwq->rebind_hold);
+       complete_all(&idle_rebind.rebind_hold);
 
        /* rebind busy workers */
        for_each_busy_worker(worker, i, pos, gcwq) {
@@ -1481,7 +1479,7 @@ retry:
 
        /*
         * we will leave rebind_workers(), have to wait until no worker
-        * has ref to this idle_rebind nor rebind_hold.
+        * has ref to this idle_rebind.
         */
        if (--idle_rebind.ref_cnt) {
                spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
@@ -3848,8 +3846,6 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
                        mutex_init(&pool->manager_mutex);
                        ida_init(&pool->worker_ida);
                }
-
-               init_waitqueue_head(&gcwq->rebind_hold);
        }
 
        /* create the initial worker */
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to