On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:18:34AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Now that the rcu_node structures' ->completed fields are unconditionally
> assigned at grace-period cleanup time, they should already have the
> correct value for the new grace period at grace-period initialization
> time.  This commit therefore inserts a WARN_ON_ONCE() to verify this
> invariant.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <j...@joshtriplett.org>

>  kernel/rcutree.c |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 1373388..86903df 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1098,6 +1098,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>               rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
>               rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
>               rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
> +             WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->completed != rsp->completed);
>               rnp->completed = rsp->completed;
>               if (rnp == rdp->mynode)
>                       rcu_start_gp_per_cpu(rsp, rnp, rdp);
> @@ -2795,7 +2796,8 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp,
>                       raw_spin_lock_init(&rnp->fqslock);
>                       lockdep_set_class_and_name(&rnp->fqslock,
>                                                  &rcu_fqs_class[i], fqs[i]);
> -                     rnp->gpnum = 0;
> +                     rnp->gpnum = rsp->gpnum;
> +                     rnp->completed = rsp->completed;
>                       rnp->qsmask = 0;
>                       rnp->qsmaskinit = 0;
>                       rnp->grplo = j * cpustride;
> -- 
> 1.7.8
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to