On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:18:35AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>
> 
> Before grace-period initialization was moved to a kthread, the CPU
> invoking this code would have at least one callback that needed
> a grace period, often a newly registered callback.  However, moving
> grace-period initialization means that the CPU with the callback
> that was requesting a grace period is not necessarily the CPU that
> is initializing the grace period, so this acceleration is less
> valuable.  Because it also adds to the complexity of reasoning about
> correctness, this commit removes it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>

>  kernel/rcutree.c |   19 -------------------
>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index 86903df..44609c3 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1055,25 +1055,6 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
>       rsp->gpnum++;
>       trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rsp->gpnum, "start");
>       record_gp_stall_check_time(rsp);
> -
> -     /*
> -      * Because this CPU just now started the new grace period, we
> -      * know that all of its callbacks will be covered by this upcoming
> -      * grace period, even the ones that were registered arbitrarily
> -      * recently.    Therefore, advance all RCU_NEXT_TAIL callbacks
> -      * to RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL.  When the CPU later recognizes the
> -      * start of the new grace period, it will advance all callbacks
> -      * one position, which will cause all of its current outstanding
> -      * callbacks to be handled by the newly started grace period.
> -      *
> -      * Other CPUs cannot be sure exactly when the grace period started.
> -      * Therefore, their recently registered callbacks must pass through
> -      * an additional RCU_NEXT_READY stage, so that they will be handled
> -      * by the next RCU grace period.
> -      */
> -     rdp = __this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
> -     rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL] = rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL];
> -
>       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
>  
>       /* Exclude any concurrent CPU-hotplug operations. */
> -- 
> 1.7.8
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to